Om Prakash v. Union of India: Supreme Court Upholds Juvenile Rights in Delayed Justice Cases
The Supreme Court recognized judicial failure to address juvenility claims, emphasizing reformation and rehabilitation of juveniles in conflict with law.
Adv. Priya Sharma
Partner, Juvenile Justice
Introduction
In Om Prakash v. Union of India (2025), the Supreme Court addressed the rights of juveniles whose age determination was delayed by the justice system, emphasizing constitutional mandates of reformation and rehabilitation.
Constitutional Framework
The Court emphasized that the Juvenile Justice Act embodies constitutional principles of:
- Reformation: Focus on reforming juvenile offenders rather than punishment
- Rehabilitation: Reintegrating juveniles into society as productive citizens
- Special Protection: Recognizing vulnerable status of children in conflict with law
Judicial Duty
The Court held that judiciary has a duty to go beyond procedural constraints to uphold fundamental rights of juveniles, especially when systemic delays prejudice their rights.
Implications
This judgment mandates courts at all levels to proactively examine juvenility claims and ensure timely age determination to protect juvenile rights.
Legal Disclaimer
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The information contained herein may not be applicable to all situations and may not reflect the most current legal developments. Please consult with a qualified attorney for specific legal advice regarding your situation.
